French Defense: Winawer Variation, Petrosian Variation
French Defense: Winawer Variation
Definition
The Winawer Variation is a sharp and heavily researched branch of the French Defense that arises after the moves 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Bb4. By pinning the knight on c3, Black immediately challenges the center and signals an intention to create long-term structural imbalances.
Typical Move Order & Key Ideas
After 3…Bb4 the most common continuation is:
4. e5 c5
5. a3 Bxc3+
6. bxc3 Ne7
- Imbalance: Black voluntarily gives up the dark-squared bishop, saddling White with doubled c-pawns and an isolated a-pawn.
- Plans for White: Exploit the bishop pair and a space advantage in the center; typical attacking ideas involve Qg4, long castling, and a pawn storm on the kingside.
- Plans for Black: Undermine the pawns with …Qa5, …Nbc6, and breaks such as …f6 or …cxd4. In many lines Black castles queenside and counterattacks on the opposite wing.
Strategic Themes
- Bishop Pair vs. Structure: The Winawer is one of the classic examples of Nimzovich’s principle of “two weaknesses.” Black concedes the bishop pair but argues that the c-pawns and light squares will become chronic targets.
- Color-Complex Struggle: Because Black no longer has the dark-squared bishop, the dark squares (d6, e5, f6) are especially sensitive, whereas White must watch the light squares around c4, d5, and a3.
- Dynamic vs. Static: Both sides often castle on opposite wings, leading to double-edged positions where tempi and initiative are more important than material count.
Historical Significance
Named after the Polish master Szymon Winawer, the variation was a favorite of the hypermodern school in the 1920s and later received deep theoretical treatment from players such as Botvinnik, Uhlmann, and Korchnoi. In modern times it remains one of the most theoretically critical replies to 3.Nc3, appearing in the repertoires of Magnus Carlsen, Alexander Morozevich, and many leading French-Defense specialists.
Illustrative Games
-
Fischer – Uhlmann, Buenos Aires 1970
The famed 7.Qg4 line. Fischer sacrificed pawns for a brutal kingside attack, only to see Uhlmann’s resilient defense hold the balance for many moves before finally breaking. -
Kasparov – Short, PCA World Ch. Match G5, London 1993
Kasparov’s aggressive long-castling approach illustrated the power of the bishop pair and a rolling h-pawn. -
Carlsen – Anand, WCh Game 9, Sochi 2014
Although Anand eventually deviated, the opening choice signaled his readiness to play for uncompromising counter-chances as Black.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- The legendary analyst Mikhail Botvinnik once remarked that the Winawer “refutes” 1.e4, tongue-in-cheek praising its strategic depth.
- In Internet slang, the critical line 7.Qg4 Qc7 8.Qxg7 cxd4 is sometimes called “the Poisoned-Pawn Winawer,” echoing the Najdorf counterpart.
- French specialist Wolfgang Uhlmann scored over 70% as Black in this variation during the 1960s and 70s, helping it gain worldwide popularity.
Mini-Example in PGN
Petrosian Variation
Definition
The term “Petrosian Variation” most commonly refers to the line of the King’s Indian Defense characterized by the pawn advance 7.d5 in the position reached after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Nf3 O-O 6.Be2 e5. The move closes the center, restricts Black’s king-side counterplay, and is named after World Champion Tigran Petrosian, who employed it with great success in the 1960s.
(There is also a Petrosian Variation of the Queen’s Indian Defense, starting with 4.a3, but the King’s Indian line is by far the better-known usage.)
Core Position & Move Order
1. d4 Nf6
2. c4 g6
3. Nc3 Bg7
4. e4 d6
5. Nf3 O-O
6. Be2 e5
7. d5 ...
- Central Clamp: The pawn on d5 gains space and prevents Black’s thematic break …f5 under favorable circumstances.
- Piece Placement: White often follows with Bg5/Nd2/g4 or prepares a slow queenside expansion with b4-c5.
- Black’s Counterplay: Black must react quickly, aiming for …a5, …Nh5, …f5, or the pawn sacrifice …c6 to open lines.
Strategic Themes
- Space vs. Flexibility: White’s central pawn chain grants space but fixes pawn structures, giving Black clear targets for minority attacks and breaks.
- Queenside Majority: White typically advances b4-c5, aiming to create a passed pawn or open the b-file.
- Color-Complex Play: Petrosian, a master of prophylaxis, demonstrated how a well-timed Bg5 could neutralize Black’s dark-squared bishop and blunt any kingside initiative.
Historical Significance
Tigran Petrosian unveiled the line during the 1963 Candidates cycle and further refined it in his 1966 and 1969 World Championship matches against Boris Spassky. His systematic approach—anticipating and thwarting Black’s plans before they became dangerous—made the variation a model of prophylactic chess and influenced generations of positional players.
Illustrative Games
-
Petrosian – Spassky, World Ch. Match Game 10, Moscow 1966
A textbook demonstration: White’s queenside expansion forced a favorable ending, highlighting the long-term power of the space advantage. -
Karpov – Kasparov, World Ch. Match Game 11, Moscow 1985
Karpov used the Petrosian setup to steer the game into a slow-burn strategical battle, though Kasparov eventually found dynamic counterplay. -
Grischuk – Radjabov, Candidates 2011
Modern theory: Radjabov revived the line with …c6, sacrificing a pawn for active piece play and demonstrating ongoing theoretical vitality.
Interesting Facts & Anecdotes
- Petrosian reportedly analyzed the line for over a year before playing it in tournament practice, embodying his philosophy that “prevention is better than cure.”
- Because the advance 7.d5 locks the center, commentators sometimes call this the “Wall System” within the King’s Indian.
- In modern engines, the Petrosian line often evaluates favorably for White at depth, yet in practical play Black scores close to 50% owing to dynamic counter-chances.